Hire LLM Engineers Who Ship Production GenAI
Prompt engineering is a skill, not a role. We place senior LLM engineers who build RAG pipelines, agents, fine-tunes, and the evaluation infrastructure around them.
Prompt engineering is a skill, not a role. We place senior LLM engineers who build RAG pipelines, agents, fine-tunes, and the evaluation infrastructure around them.
Retrieval tuned on your data, agents with real tool use, not another hallucination demo.
If you cannot measure LLM quality, you cannot improve it. These engineers build the evals first, then iterate.
Model choice, caching, batching, streaming, cost per request tracked and tuned. Not a surprise invoice.
LLM Engineers
LatAm's AI community grew up on the GenAI wave.
3-5 people who fit the exact role, not a résumé dump.
We screen LLM engineers on a real RAG task plus an evaluation harness, not a prompt quiz.
Not a fit? We replace at no cost.
Operators who’ve made this hire, not account managers.
We start with a 30-minute call. You tell me the role, the stack, and what “great” looks like. No charge, no obligation.
We screen against the role-specific bar and send 3-5 people in days, not a résumé dump.
Meet your favorites. We coordinate everything. Most clients hire within ~3 weeks of the first call.
We handle contracts and payroll via Talent Management (COR). Not a fit in 90 days? We replace at no cost.
LLM hiring is where the most hype-vs-reality gap lives. Four traps founders fall into.
Prompt engineering is a skill inside a role, not a role. Hire for architecture, retrieval, and evaluation thinking. Prompts are the last 10 percent, not the first 90.
If a candidate cannot describe how they would measure whether their LLM feature is getting better or worse, they have not shipped to real users. Evals are the price of entry.
LangChain or LlamaIndex expertise matters less than retrieval architecture, embedding model choice, and agent design. Screen for the fundamentals, not for the library.
Model choice, caching, batching, context-window strategy. Every one of these is a cost lever. Great LLM engineers can draw your cost curve on a napkin. Juniors send you a surprise invoice.
Overlap is high. An LLM engineer specializes in language-model systems (RAG, agents, prompts, fine-tuning). An AI engineer is broader and typically owns the full product around the AI. If your product is primarily a chat, retrieval, or agent experience, LLM engineer is the sharper hire.
Yes. Depending on your product requirements and cost structure, they will self-host open-weights via vLLM or Together, or stay on frontier APIs. They have strong opinions on which to use when.
Yes, this is table stakes for a senior LLM hire. Offline eval harnesses, LLM-as-judge, human review loops, and regression suites are a required part of the screen.
LangChain, LlamaIndex, LangGraph, OpenAI's SDKs, Anthropic's SDKs, pgvector, Pinecone, Weaviate. Framework fluency matters less than architecture fluency, we screen for both.
Different roles. LLM engineers build on existing models; ML engineers train and deploy custom models. For most startups the LLM engineer is the right first AI hire.
Ship. Our screen specifically tests for evals, cost awareness and production hardening, which filters out demo-only candidates.
Typically 50% below US rates for equivalent seniority. See the Compensation Report or book a call for specifics.
Yes. Direct-hire, contract-to-hire, or embedded contractor, we structure around how you want to work. Start with a call.
“Tell me what AI feature you are trying to ship. I will send you LLM engineers who have already shipped something like it to real users.” Calvin, CEO of Awana